<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 8 of the 30 Day Challenge &#8211; minus Traffic Bug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawn.du-mmett.com/2010/02/07/day-8-of-the-30-day-challenge-minus-traffic-bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawn.du-mmett.com/2010/02/07/day-8-of-the-30-day-challenge-minus-traffic-bug/</link>
	<description>Adventures Stepping into the Internet Marketing World and Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Du'Mmett</title>
		<link>http://shawn.du-mmett.com/2010/02/07/day-8-of-the-30-day-challenge-minus-traffic-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Du'Mmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawn.du-mmett.com/?p=290#comment-277</guid>
		<description>It looks like Traffic Bug is still on the cards for the 2010 challenge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Traffic Bug is still on the cards for the 2010 challenge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Du'Mmett</title>
		<link>http://shawn.du-mmett.com/2010/02/07/day-8-of-the-30-day-challenge-minus-traffic-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Du'Mmett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawn.du-mmett.com/?p=290#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I agree Phil - but I am confused over who is covering who and why? It appears a big investment went into it, Ed Dale stuck behind it, Market Samurai have TB submission with the software. It obviously showed good results at some time, so what happened?
An indexer was not what it was originally meant for as far as I could tell but it did manage to accomplish that.
If I were to guess I think it has suffered from some bad management or scalability problems.
For now I think the jury has come back in and condemned it in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Phil &#8211; but I am confused over who is covering who and why? It appears a big investment went into it, Ed Dale stuck behind it, Market Samurai have TB submission with the software. It obviously showed good results at some time, so what happened?<br />
An indexer was not what it was originally meant for as far as I could tell but it did manage to accomplish that.<br />
If I were to guess I think it has suffered from some bad management or scalability problems.<br />
For now I think the jury has come back in and condemned it in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://shawn.du-mmett.com/2010/02/07/day-8-of-the-30-day-challenge-minus-traffic-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawn.du-mmett.com/?p=290#comment-150</guid>
		<description>You know, one of the intereesting things about this traffic bug (lower case) fiasco is that a number of people have said in it&#039;s defense - TB is an indexer, it&#039;s not a link builder.

Perhaps they should learn how to search on Youtube, where TB is touted as a link building marvel.

My guess is that it was meant to do something it couldn&#039;t wasn&#039;t, and now it&#039;s coverup time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, one of the intereesting things about this traffic bug (lower case) fiasco is that a number of people have said in it&#8217;s defense &#8211; TB is an indexer, it&#8217;s not a link builder.</p>
<p>Perhaps they should learn how to search on Youtube, where TB is touted as a link building marvel.</p>
<p>My guess is that it was meant to do something it couldn&#8217;t wasn&#8217;t, and now it&#8217;s coverup time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
